Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
Top
Abstract
All ivermectin studies
Meta analysis
 
Feedback
Home
next
study
previous
study
c19ivm.org COVID-19 treatment researchIvermectinIvermectin (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Azvudine Meta
Bromhexine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Curcumin Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   Meta Analysis    Recent:   

Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype

Marcolino et al., BMC Infectious Diseases, doi:10.1186/s12879-022-07589-8, PROSPERO CRD42021257471
Jul 2022  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All Studies   Meta AnalysisMeta
Ivermectin for COVID-19
4th treatment shown to reduce risk in August 2020
 
*, now known with p < 0.00000000001 from 100 studies, recognized in 22 countries.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine complementary and synergistic treatments. * >10% efficacy in meta analysis with ≥3 clinical studies.
3,800+ studies for 60+ treatments. c19ivm.org
Unreliable: pre-registered analysis of prophylaxis studies has not been reported and would show statistically significant efficacy; only 1 of 16 pre-registered outcomes for treatment studies was reported
Meta analysis including 25 of 100 studies (47 RCTs), with only 10 and 8 reporting mortality and mechanical ventilation results, finding lower mortality and mechanical ventilation without statistical significance. The conclusion is incorrect, despite substantial bias the results favor treatment, while not reaching the typical statistical significance threshold. This analysis is unreliable, for example consider Reis et al., authors give the study a perfect rating in risk of bias analysis, however this study not only has a very high theoretical risk of bias, but shows very high actual bias, randomization failure, blinding failure, and reports conflicting data that is impossible to be correct Reis.
See rumble.com for more detailed analysis, which notes several issues including the following:
Pre-registration crd.york.ac.uk indicates that the authors will analyze prophylaxis studies. This is even included in the title "Use of ivermectin for prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19...", however the paper indicates the protocol has changed without explanation to exclude prophylaxis: "...two were excluded for testing the drug for COVID-19 prophylaxis". The two excluded papers were Seet, Shouman, which both show statistically significant reduction in symptomatic cases.
Pre-registration had very different outcomes, specifying the main outcomes as:
"Number of mortality; number of patients who experienced adverse events during follow up; protection rate; % of patients progressing from mild to moderate or severe stages of disease and % of hospitalization of medical cause in patients with COVID-19 will be collected for intervention and control groups.
For treatment, mortality and severity of disease according to the WHO criteria. Change (Day 7-Baseline) Liver Enzymes; Number of patients who reported less anosmia/hyposmia; Number of patients who reported less cough; % of reduction on body temperature; Mean duration of hospitalization after treatment; follow up at day 7 asymptomatic; Hospital discharge by day 10; Admission in ICU; Survival without ICU; Successful extubation rates; Survival without oxygen; % of patients progressing from mild to moderate or severe stages of diseases; Rate of progression of the disease, or the deterioration of the clinical condition of the patients; Mean recovery time will be collected for intervention and control groups."
In the paper this has become:
"The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and invasive ventilation support. Secondary outcome was the percentage of patients who presented adverse events at follow-up."
7 meta analyses show significant improvements with ivermectin for mortality Bryant, Hariyanto, Kory, Lawrie, Nardelli, Zein, hospitalization Schwartz, recovery Kory, and cases Kory.
Currently there are 100 ivermectin for COVID-19 studies, showing 49% lower mortality [35‑60%], 29% lower ventilation [13‑42%], 38% lower ICU admission [14‑56%], 34% lower hospitalization [20‑45%], and 81% fewer cases [71‑87%].
Marcolino et al., 23 Jul 2022, Brazil, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, trial PROSPERO CRD42021257471. Contact: milenamarc@gmail.com (corresponding author).
This PaperIvermectinAll
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype
Milena Soriano Marcolino, Karina Cardoso Meira, Nathalia Sernizon Guimarães, Paula Perdigão Motta, Victor Schulthais Chagas, Silvana Márcia Bruschi Kelles, Laura Caetano De Sá, Reginaldo Aparecido Valacio, Patrícia Klarmann Ziegelmann
BMC Infectious Diseases, doi:10.1186/s12879-022-07589-8
Background: The role of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19 is still under debate, yet the drug has been widely used in some parts of the world, as shown by impressive market data. The available body of evidence may have changed over the last months, as studies have been retracted and "standards of care" (SOC) used in control groups have changed with rapidly evolving knowledge on COVID-19. This review aims to summarize and critically appraise the evidence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ivermectin, assessing clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Methods: RCTs evaluating the effects of ivermectin in adult patients with COVID-19 were searched through June 22, 2022, in four databases, L.OVE platform, clinical trial registries and pre-prints platforms. Primary endpoints included allcause mortality and invasive ventilation requirement. Secondary endpoint was the occurrence of adverse events. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Meta-analysis included only studies which compared ivermectin to placebo or SOC. Random-effects were used to pool the risk ratios (RRs) of individual trials. The quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. The protocol was register in PROSPERO (CRD42021257471). Results: Twenty-five RCTs fulfilled inclusion criteria (n = 6310). Of those, 14 compared ivermectin with placebo, in night ivermectin associated with SOC was compared to SOC and two studies compared ivermectin to an active comparator. Most RCTs had some concerns or high risk of bias, mostly due to lack of concealment of the randomization sequence and allocation, lack of blinding and high number of missing cases. Ivermectin did not show an effect in reducing mortality (RR = 0.76; 95%CI: 0.52-1.11) or mechanical ventilation (RR = 0.74; 95%CI: 0.48-1.16). This effect was consistent when comparing ivermectin vs. placebo, and ivermectin associated with SOC vs. SOC, as well as in sensitivity analysis. Additionally, there was very low quality of evidence regarding adverse effects (RR = 1.07; 95%CI: 0.84-1.35). Conclusions: The evidence suggests that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement. Although we did not observe an increase in the risk of adverse effects, the evidence is very uncertain regarding this endpoint.
Abbreviations Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12879-022-07589-8. Additional Author contributions Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work: MSM and NSG. Substantial contributions to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work: MSM, NSG, KCM, VSC, LCS, SMBK, RAV, PKZ, PPM. Drafted the manuscript: MSM, KCM, VSC, NSG. Revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content: MSM, NSG, KCM, VSC, LCS, SMBK, RAV, PKZ, PPM. Final approval of the version to be published: MSM, NSG, KCM, VSC, LCS, SMBK, RAV, PKZ, PPM. Agreement to be accountable for the author's own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature: MSM, NSG, KCM, VSC, LCS, SMBK, RAV, PKZ, PPM. All authors read and approved he final manuscript. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable, as this is a systematic review. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. • fast, convenient online submission • thorough peer review by experienced researchers in your field • rapid publication on..
References
Abd-Elsalam, Noor, Badawi, Clinical study evaluating the efficacy of ivermectin in COVID-19 treatment: a randomized controlled study, J Med Virol, doi:10.1002/jmv.27122
Agarwal, Rochwerg, Lamontagne, A living WHO guideline on drugs for COVID-19, BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.m3379
Ahmed, Karim, Ross, A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness, Int J Infect Dis
Araya, Kraemer, Burdiles, Herrera, Castillo et al., The living overview of evidence database (LOVE) may be more efficient than a traditional search of systematic reviews and randomized trials
Axfors, Schmitt, Janiaud, Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials, Nat Commun, doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22446-z
Babalola, Bode, Ajayi, Alakaloko, Akase et al., Ivermectin shows clinical benefits in mild to moderate COVID19: a randomized controlled double-blind, dose-response study in Lagos, QJM, doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcab035
Bhimraj, Morgan, Shumaker, Infectious diseases Society of America guidelines on the treatment and management of patients with COVID-19, Clin Infect Dis, doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa478
Biber, Mandelboim, Harmelin, Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of nonhospitalized patients with mild COVID-19-a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial, doi:10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1
Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, Hr, Introduction to meta-analysis, doi:10.1002/9780470743386
Bryant, Lawrie, Dowswell, Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis to inform clinical guidelines, Am J Ther, doi:10.1097/MJT.0000000000001402
Bukhari, Asghar, Perveen, Efficacy of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients with mild to moderate disease, MedRxiv, doi:10.1101/2021.02.02.21250840v1
Buonfrate, Chesini, Martini, Roncaglioni, Fernandez et al., High-dose ivermectin for early treatment of COVID-19 (COVER study): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase II, dosefinding, proof-of-concept clinical trial, Int J Antimicrob Agents, doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106516
Caly, Druce, Catton, The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, Antiviral Res Elsevier
Campillo, Boussinesq, Bertout, Faillie, Chesnais, Serious adverse reactions associated with ivermectin: a systematic pharmacovigilance study in sub-Saharan Africa and in the rest of the World, PLoS Negl Trop Dis, doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009354
Chaccour, Casellas, Blanco-Di Matteo, The effect of early treatment with ivermectin on viral load, symptoms and humoral response in patients with non-severe COVID-19: a pilot, double-blind, placebocontrolled, randomized clinical trial, EClinicalMedicine, doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100720
Chachar, Khan, Asif, Tanveer, Khaqan et al., Effectiveness of ivermectin in SARS-COV-2/COVID-10 patients, Intern J Sci, doi:10.18483/ijSci.2378
Chowdhury, Shahbaz, Karim, Islam, Dan et al., A comparative study on ivermectin-doxycycline and hydroxychloroquineazithromycin therapy on COVID-19 patients, Eurasian J Med Oncol
Cochrane, None
Communit, Living systematic reviews
Duval, Tweedie, Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis, Biometrics, doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x
Elgazzar, Eltaweel, Youssef, Efficacy and safety of ivermectin for treatment and prophylaxis of COVID-19 pandemic, Res, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-100956/v3
Faisal, Shah, Hussain, Potential use of azithromycin alone and in combination with ivermectin in fighting against the symptoms of COVID-19, Professional Med J, doi:10.29309/TPMJ/2021.28.05.5867
Furlan, Caramelli, The regrettable story of the "Covid Kit" and the "Early Treatment of Covid-19, Lancet Reg Health Am, doi:10.1016/j.lana.2021.100089
Galan, Santos, Asato, Phase 2 randomized study on chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin in hospitalized patients with severe manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection, Pathog Glob Health
George, Moorthy, Kulkarni, Single dose of ivermectin is not useful in patients with hematological disorders and COVID-19 illness: a phase II B open labelled randomized controlled trial, Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus
Ghazy, Almaghraby, Shaaban, A systematic review and meta-analysis on chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as monotherapy or combined with azithromycin in COVID-19 treatment, Sci Rep, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77748-x
Gonzalez, Gámez, Enciso, Maldonado, Palacios et al., Efficacy and safety of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine in patients with severe COVID-19: a randomized controlled trial, Infect Dis Rep, doi:10.3390/idr14020020
Gorial, Mashhadani, Sayaly, Effectiveness of ivermectin as add-on therapy in COVID-19 management (Pilot Trial), doi:10.1101/2020.07.07.20145979v1
Guyatt, Oxman, Vist, GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
Hazan, Gunaratne, Dolai, Clancy, Mccullough et al., Effectiveness of ivermectin-based multidrug therapy in severely hypoxic, ambulatory COVID-19 patients, Future Microbiol, doi:10.2217/fmb-2022-0014
Heidary, Gharebaghi, Ivermectin: a systematic review from antiviral effects to COVID-19 complementary regimen, J Antibiot, doi:10.1038/s41429-020-0336-z
Higgins, Lasserson, Chandler, Standards for the conduct and reporting of new Cochrane Intervention Reviews, reporting of protocols and the planning, conduct and reporting of updates
Higgins, Thomas, Chandler, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version
Hill, Garratt, Levi, Meta-analysis of randomized trials of ivermectin to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection, Open Forum Infect Dis, doi:10.1093/ofid/ofab358
Izcovich, Peiris, Ragusa, Tortosa, Rada et al., Bias as a source of inconsistency in ivermectin trials for COVID-19: a systematic review. Ivermectin's suggested benefits are mainly based on potentially biased results, J Clin Epidemiol
Kinobe, Owens, A systematic review of experimental evidence for antiviral effects of ivermectin and an in silico analysis of ivermectin's possible mode of action against SARS-CoV-2, Fundam Clin Pharmacol, doi:10.1111/fcp.12644
Kishoria, Mathur, Parmar, Ivermectin as adjuvant to hydroxychloroquine in patients resistant to standard treatment for SARS-CoV-2: results of an open-label randomized clinical study, Paripex Indian J Res
Krolewiecki, Lifschitz, Moragas, Travacio, Valentini et al., Corrigendum to antiviral effect of high-dose ivermectin in adults with COVID-19: a proof-of-concept randomized trial, EClinicalMedicine, doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101119
Lawrence, Meyerowitz-Katz, Heathers, The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable, Nat Med, doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01535-y
Lehrer, Rheinstein, Ivermectin docks to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain attached to ACE2, Vivo, doi:10.21873/invivo.12134
Lim, Hor, Tay, Jelani, Tan et al., Efficacy of ivermectin treatment on disease progression among adults with mild to moderate COVID-19 and comorbidities: the I-TECH randomized clinical trial, JAMA Intern Med
López-Medina, López, Hurtado, Effect of ivermectin on time to resolution of symptoms among adults with mild COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA, doi:10.1001/jama.2021.3071
Machado, Marcon, Carta às Editoras sobre o artigo de Melo et al, Cadernos de Saúde Públ, doi:10.1590/0102-311X00028721
Manomaipiboon, Pholtawornkulchai, Pupipatpab, Suraamornkul, Maneerit et al., COVID-19 infection: a randomized, double blind, placebo, controlled trial, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1290999/v1
Mega, Latin America's embrace of an unproven COVID treatment is hindering drug trials, Nature, doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02958-2
Meneses, Commentary about open-label randomized controlled study of ivermectin in mild to moderate COVID-19, IMC J Med Sci
Mohan, Tiwari, Suri, Single-dose oral ivermectin in mild and moderate COVID-19 (RIVET-COV): a single-centre randomized, placebocontrolled trial, J Infect Chemother
Naggie, placebo-controlled randomized, platform clinical trial, doi:10.1101/2022.06.10.22276252
Niaee, Namdar, Allami, Ivermectin as an adjunct treatment for hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients: a randomized multi-center clinical trial, Asian Pac J Trop Med
Okumuş, Demirtürk, Çetinkaya, Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of adding ivermectin to treatment in severe COVID-19 patients, BMC Infect Dis, doi:10.1186/s12879-021-06104-9
Ouzzani, Hammady, Fedorowicz, Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews, Syst Rev, doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Page, Mckenzie, Bossuyt, Boutron, Hoffmann et al., The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
Podder, Chowdhury, Sina, Haque, Outcome of ivermectin treated mild to moderate COVID-19 cases: a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled study, IMC J Med Sci
Popp, Stegemann, Metzendorf, Gould, Kranke et al., Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD015017
Porta, Bornstein, Coye, Acute chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine toxicity: a review for emergency clinicians, Am J Emerg Med, doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.07.030
Pott-Junior, Paoliello, Miguel, Use of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19: a pilot trial, Toxicol Rep, doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.03.003
Prokop, Van Everdingen, Van Rees, Vt, COVID-19 Standardized Reporting Working Group of the Dutch Radiological Society. CO-RADS: a categorical CT assessment scheme for patients suspected of having COVID-19-definition and evaluation, Radiology
Quincho-Lopez, Benites-Ibarra, Gomez, Quijano-Escate, Taype-Rondan, Self-medication practices to prevent or manage COVID-19: a systematic review, PLoS ONE, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259317
Ravikirti, Pattadar, Raj, Agarwal, Biswas et al., Evaluation of ivermectin as a potential treatment for mild to moderate COVID-19: a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial in Eastern India, J Pharm Pharm Sci
Reardon, Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies, Nature, doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02081-w
Reis, Silva, Silva, Thabane, Effect of early treatment with ivermectin among patients with COVID-19, N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2115869
Rocha, Cid-Lopez, Venegas-Lopez, Gómez-Mendes, Sánches-Ortiz, Ivermectin compared with placebo in the clinical evolution of Mexican patients with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial, Res Square, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1640339/v1
Samaha, Mouawia, Fawaz, Effects of a single dose of ivermectin on viral and clinical outcomes in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects: a pilot clinical trial in Lebanon, Viruses, doi:10.3390/v13112154
Schmith, Zhou, Lohmer, The Approved dose of ivermectin alone is not the ideal dose for the treatment of COVID-19, Am Soc Clin Pharmacol Thera, doi:10.1002/cpt.1889
Schünemann, Vist, Higgins, Chapter 15: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions
Seet, Quek, Ooi, Positive impact of oral hydroxychloroquine and povidone-iodine throat spray for COVID-19 prophylaxis: an open-label randomized trial, Int J Infect Dis, doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.035
Senado, Senado Notícias. Fabricante de ivermectina lucrou à custa de vidas, acusam senadores da CPI
Shahbaznejad, Davoudi, Eslami, Effects of ivermectin in patients with COVID-19: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial, Clin Thera
Shouman, Hegazy, Nafae, Use of ivermectin as a potential chemoprophylaxis for COVID-19 in Egypt: a randomised clinical trial, J Clin Diagn Res, doi:10.7860/JCDR/2020/46795.0000
Siemieniuk, Bartoszko, Ge, Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis, BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.m2980
Skipper, Pastick, Engen, Hydroxychloroquine in nonhospitalized adults with early COVID-19: a randomized trial, Ann Intern Med, doi:10.7326/M20-4207
Somerville, Curran, Dol, Public health implications of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern: a rapid scoping review, BMJ Open, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055781
Stefany, Almeida, Fonseca Almeida ; Burki, group which conducted data extraction; and Professor Maria Auxiliadora Parreiras Martins, doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30227-2
Sterne, Egger, Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis, J Clin Epidemiol, doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00377-8
Sterne, Savović, Page, RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials, BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898
Temple, Hoang, Hendrickson, Toxic effects from ivermectin use associated with prevention and treatment, N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMc2114907
Vallejos, Zoni, Bangher, Ivermectin to prevent hospitalizations in patients with COVID-19 (IVERCOR-COVID19) a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, BMC Infect Dis, doi:10.1186/s12879-021-06348-5
Zhang, Wen, Yin, Efficacy of COVID-19 treatments: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Front Public Health, doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.729559
Loading..
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Vaccines and treatments are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit