Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
Top
Results
Abstract
All ivermectin studies
Meta analysis
 
Feedback
Home
next
study
previous
study
c19ivm.org COVID-19 treatment researchIvermectinIvermectin (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Azvudine Meta
Bromhexine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Curcumin Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   Meta Analysis    Recent:   
0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ COVID-19 pneumonia -205% Improvement Relative Risk Use of therapeutic agents.. -215% Improvement, 168hr, imp.. -4% primary Recovery, 168hr, clinical.. 4% Recovery, 240hr, clinical.. 4% Dyspnea median recovery.. 38% no CI Ivermectin  Mikamo et al.  EARLY TREATMENT  DB RCT Is early treatment with ivermectin beneficial for COVID-19? Double-blind RCT 1,029 patients in multiple countries (Nov 2021 - Aug 2022) Higher progression with ivermectin (not stat. sig., p=0.49) c19ivm.org Mikamo et al., J. Infection and Chemot.., Sep 2022 Favors ivermectin Favors control

Efficacy and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild COVID-19 in Japan and Thailand

Mikamo et al., Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, doi:10.1016/j.jiac.2023.12.012 (date from news release), NCT05056883
Sep 2022  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All   Meta
Ivermectin for COVID-19
4th treatment shown to reduce risk in August 2020
 
*, now known with p < 0.00000000001 from 100 studies, recognized in 22 countries.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine complementary and synergistic treatments. * >10% efficacy in meta analysis with ≥3 clinical studies.
3,800+ studies for 60+ treatments. c19ivm.org
RCT very low risk patients (mean age 35.7, SpO2 97.4) showing no significant differences with rapid recovery and almost no progression in both groups.
The groups were unbalanced. There were 41% more patients with dyspnea at baseline in the treatment group. Similarly, at baseline patients with 4+ symptoms scored 2+ were more common in the treatment group - 7% for ivermectin vs. 4% for placebo.
Table S8 shows only one case of COVID-19 pneumonia. Authors report 3 and 1 cases of progression, this matches the 3 and 1 cases of the adverse event "COVID-19" in Table S8. It's unclear how the COVID-19 adverse events were defined since all patients are meant to have COVID-19. Authors definition of progression includes "use of COVID-19 therapeutic agents" and therefore the significance for progression of disease is not clear.
The study is designed to produce a null result with very low risk patients, administration on an empty stomach, the primary outcome including symptoms that are expected side effects of ivermectin, and only 3 day treatment.
The inclusion criteria were changed after starting the trial to further favor finding no effect - including even younger low-risk patients, including patients without fever, and allowing a larger delay in specimen collection (Table S2).
The most serious symptom reported is dyspnea. Notably, per symptom results show much faster initial recovery of dyspnea with ivermectin, with 50% recovered within ~26.5 hours for ivermectin compared to ~42.5 hours for placebo.
Diarrhea and abdominal pain were worse with ivermectin, however these are typical side effects. Ivermectin may cause gastrointestinal upset, especially when taken on an empty stomach.
Authors include patients that were PCR- at baseline - 14% for ivermectin and 17% for placebo.
For viral clearance, the number of patients with results does not match the event counts and percentages.
The informed consent date statistics suggest that randomization resulted in confounding by time, with 45% vs 41% in the second period reported, and 41% vs. 44% in the third period.
This is the 43rd of 47 COVID-19 RCTs for ivermectin, which collectively show efficacy with p=0.0000002.
This is the 93rd of 100 COVID-19 controlled studies for ivermectin, which collectively show efficacy with p<0.0000000001 (1 in 1 sextillion).
This study is excluded in the after exclusion results of meta analysis: very low risk group with almost no progression leaves little room for improvement, unbalanced baseline dyspnea and high symptom scores, design and post-hoc changes favor null result.
COVID-19 pneumonia, 205.0% higher, RR 3.05, p = 0.49, treatment 1 of 502 (0.2%), control 0 of 527 (0.0%), continuity correction due to zero event (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), Table S8.
use of therapeutic agents, oxygen, transfer, hospitalization, death, 214.9% higher, RR 3.15, p = 0.36, treatment 3 of 502 (0.6%), control 1 of 527 (0.2%).
risk of no improvement, 4.0% higher, HR 1.04, p = 0.62, treatment 502, control 527, 168hr, improving trend, primary outcome.
risk of no recovery, 4.0% lower, HR 0.96, p = 0.72, treatment 502, control 527, 168hr, clinical resolution, Figure S3.
risk of no recovery, 4.0% lower, HR 0.96, p = 0.64, treatment 502, control 527, 240hr, clinical resolution, Figure S3.
dyspnea median recovery time, 37.6% lower, RR 0.62, treatment 55, control 39, dyspnea.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Mikamo et al., 26 Sep 2022, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, multiple countries, peer-reviewed, 19 authors, study period 12 November, 2021 - 7 August, 2022, dosage 300μg/kg days 1-3, trial NCT05056883 (history). Contact: mikamo@aichi-med-u.ac.jp.
This PaperIvermectinAll
Efficacy and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild COVID-19 in Japan and Thailand
M.D Hiroshige Mikamo, M.D Satoshi Takahashi, M.D Yuka Yamagishi, Ph.D Akihiro Hirakawa, M.D Toshiyuki Harada, M.D Hirotaka Nagashima, M.D Chiaki Noguchi, M.D Kentaro Masuko, M.D Hiromitsu Maekawa, M.D Tatsuhiko Kashii, Hiroyuki Ohbayashi, Shinichiro Hosokawa, Katsuyuki Maejima, Masaya Yamato, Weerawat Manosuthi, Supachai Paiboonpol, Hideki Suganami, Ryohei Tanigawa, Hitoshi Kawamura
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, doi:10.1016/j.jiac.2023.12.012
Background: Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug administered to hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Fundamental research suggests that ivermectin is effective against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); therefore, we investigated the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment option. Methods: This multi-regional (Japan and Thailand), multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, Phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild COVID-19 (IVERMILCO Study). The participants took a specified number of the investigational product (ivermectin or placebo) tablets of, adjusted to a dose of 0.3-0.4 mg/kg, orally on an empty stomach once daily for three days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time at which clinical symptoms first showed an improving trend by 168 h after investigational product administration. Results: A total of 1,030 eligible participants were assigned to receive the investigational product; 502 participants received ivermectin and 527 participants received a placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was approximately 96 h (approximately four days) for both ivermectin and placebo groups, which did not show statistically significant difference (stratified log-rank test, p=0.61). The incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions did not show statistically significant differences between the ivermectin and placebo groups (chi-square test, p=0.97, p=0.59). Conclusions: The results show that ivermectin(0.3-0.4 mg/kg), as a treatment for patients with mild COVID-19, is ineffective; however, its safety has been confirmed for participants, J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Confidential including minor participants of 12 years or older. (IVERMILCO Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05056883.
Conflict of Interest assistance with an earlier version of the manuscript and Kowa employees, Masaya Tanahashi and Tatsuya Muto for statistical analysis and interpretation of this study results. We also thank to Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
References
Ashburn, Thor, Drug repositioning: Identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs, Nat Rev Drug Discov, doi:10.1038/nrd1468
Bernal, Da Silva, Musungaie, Kovalchuk, Gonzalez et al., Molnupiravir for oral treatment of Covid-19 in nonhospitalized patients, N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2116044
Bramante, Huling, Tignanelli, Buse, Liebovitz et al., Randomized trial of metformin, ivermectin, and fluvoxamine for Covid-19, N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2201662
Bryant, Lawrie, Dowswell, Fordham, Mitchell et al., Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Metaanalysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines, Am J Ther, doi:10.1097/MJT.0000000000001402
Caly, Druce, Catton, Jans, Wagstaff, The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, Antiviral Res, doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104787
Chable-Bessia, Boullé, Neyret, Swain, Hénaut et al., Low Selectivity Indices of Ivermectin and Macrocyclic Lactones on SARS-CoV-2 Replication In Vitro, COVID, doi:10.3390/covid2010005
Crump, Ōmura, Ivermectin, 'wonder drug' from Japan: the human use perspective, Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci, doi:10.2183/pjab.87.13
Hammond, Leister-Tebbe, Gardner, Abreu, Wisemandle, Oral nirmatrelvir for high-risk, nonhospitalized adults with Covid-19, N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2118542
López-Medina, López, Hurtado I C, Dávalos, Ramirez, Martinez, Effect of ivermectin on time to resolution of symptoms among adults with mild COVID-19: A randomized clinical trial, JAMA, doi:10.1001/jama.2021.3071
Mathieu, Ritchie, Rodés-Guirao, Appel, Giattino et al., Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19)
Naggie, Boulware, Lindsell, Stewart, Gentile et al., Effect of ivermectin vs placebo on time to sustained recovery in outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19: A randomized clinical trial, JAMA, doi:10.1001/jama.2022.18590
Naggie, Boulware, Lindsell, Stewart, Slandzicki et al., Effect of higher-dose ivermectin for 6 days vs placebo on time to sustained recovery in outpatients with COVID-19. A Randomized Clinical Trial, JAMA, doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1650
Ng, Salim, Chu, Drug repurposing for COVID-19: Approaches, challenges and promising candidates, Pharmacol Ther, doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107930
Reis, Silva, Silva D C M, Thabane, Milagres, Ferreira, r n a l P r e -p r o o f Effect of early treatment with ivermectin among patients with Covid-19, N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2115869
Smit, Ochomo, Aljayyoussi, Kwambai, Abong'o B O et al., Safety and mosquitocidal efficacy of high-dose ivermectin when coadministered with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in Kenyan adults with uncomplicated malaria (IVERMAL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Lancet, doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30163-4
Zaidi, Dehgani-Mobaraki, The mechanisms of action of ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2-an extensive review, J Antibiot, doi:10.1038/s41429-021-00491-6
Loading..
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Vaccines and treatments are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit