Alkalinization
Analgesics..
Antiandrogens..
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Cannabidiol
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Ensovibep
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Iota-carragee..
Ivermectin
Lactoferrin
Lifestyle..
Melatonin
Metformin
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
Nitric Oxide
Paxlovid
Peg.. Lambda
Povidone-Iod..
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Vitamins..
Zinc

Other
Feedback
Home
Home   COVID-19 treatment studies for Ivermectin  COVID-19 treatment studies for Ivermectin  C19 studies: Ivermectin  Ivermectin   Select treatmentSelect treatmentTreatmentsTreatments
Alkalinization Meta Lactoferrin Meta
Melatonin Meta
Bromhexine Meta Metformin Meta
Budesonide Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Cannabidiol Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta Nitric Oxide Meta
Ensovibep Meta Paxlovid Meta
Famotidine Meta Peg.. Lambda Meta
Favipiravir Meta Povidone-Iod.. Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Quercetin Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Remdesivir Meta
Iota-carragee.. Meta
Ivermectin Meta Zinc Meta

Other Treatments Global Adoption
All Studies   Meta Analysis   Recent:  
0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ Mortality -5% Improvement Relative Risk Death/intubation -54% Death/intubation/ICU -62% c19ivm.org Ferreira et al. Ivermectin for COVID-19 LATE Is late treatment with ivermectin beneficial for COVID-19? Retrospective 102 patients in Brazil (March - July 2020) Higher death/intubation with ivermectin (not stat. sig., p=0.37) Ferreira et al., Revista da Associação Médica Br.., doi:10.1590/1806-9282.20210661 Favors ivermectin Favors control
Outcomes associated with Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a single-center experience
Ferreira et al., Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, doi:10.1590/1806-9282.20210661
Ferreira et al., Outcomes associated with Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a.., Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, doi:10.1590/1806-9282.20210661
Nov 2021   Source   PDF  
  Twitter
  Facebook
Share
  All Studies   Meta
Retrospective 230 hospitalized patients in Brazil showing no significant difference with ivermectin treatment. Authors note that the treatments were more likely to be offered to sicker patients. Authors indicate that they do not know when medication was started, which in some cases could have been after ICU admission or intubation. Baseline total chest CT opacities was 20% for ivermectin vs. 15% for control. Dosage is unknown. This study is excluded in the after exclusion results of meta analysis: unadjusted results with no group details; substantial unadjusted confounding by indication likely.
risk of death, 5.0% higher, RR 1.05, p = 1.00, treatment 3 of 21 (14.3%), control 11 of 81 (13.6%).
risk of death/intubation, 54.3% higher, RR 1.54, p = 0.37, treatment 6 of 21 (28.6%), control 15 of 81 (18.5%).
risk of death/intubation/ICU, 62.4% higher, RR 1.62, p = 0.27, treatment 8 of 21 (38.1%), control 19 of 81 (23.5%).
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Ferreira et al., 26 Nov 2021, retrospective, Brazil, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, study period 12 March, 2020 - 8 July, 2020, average treatment delay 7.0 days, dosage not specified.
All Studies   Meta Analysis   Submit Updates or Corrections
This PaperIvermectinAll
Abstract: ORIGINAL ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20210661 Outcomes associated with Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a single-center experience Roberto Muniz Ferreira1,2* , Renata Wanderley Beranger1 , Pedro Paulo Noguères Sampaio1,2 , João Mansur Filho1 , Ricardo Antônio Correia Lima1,3 SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin are advocated as potential treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) despite the lack of supportive clinical evidence. In this study, outcomes associated with Hydroxychloroquine and/or Ivermectin were determined in a series of patients with confirmed COVID-19 from a single institution in Brazil. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted between March and July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into four treatment categories: no treatment (Group 0), Ivermectin only (Group I), Hydroxychloroquine only (Group II), and Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin (Group III). Intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and death were compared between the Groups. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients were included, with the following treatment distribution: 35.2% (0), 9.1% (I), 48.3% (II), and 7.4% (III). Groups I, II, and III had the higher rates of Intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, or death (0: 23.5% versus I: 38.1% versus II: 37.8% versus III: 70.6%, p=0.002), and the greatest mortality was found in Group III (0 versus III: 13.6% versus 35.3%, p=0.03). In the multivariate analysis, Hydroxychloroquine remained significantly associated with death (OR 3.3, 95%CI 1.1–9.6, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: In a series of consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19, Ivermectin was not associated with improved outcomes and Hydroxychloroquine may have resulted in a harmful effect. KEYWORDS: Coronavirus. Hydroxychloroquine. Ivermectin. Prognosis.
Late treatment
is less effective
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. Vaccines and treatments are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit